2/25/2023 0 Comments Jamie raskin hair piece![]() But these tragedies differ from the wilful and deliberate destruction of homes in reprisal. These are calamities commonly incident to such warfare. March 26, 1965: There is a considerable amount of pious hypocrisy in some of the moans of outrage over the use of nontoxic gases in South Vietnam.Īugust 15, 1965: During the course of actual fighting, civilians may be wounded and killed and the tide of battle may engulf and destroy civilian homes. ![]() Those who have a different view may lack the information on which the decision was made.įebruary 18, 1965: The violent words and violent acts of the past few days disclose with a dreadful clarity that Vietnam is not an isolated battlefield but a part of a long war which the Communist world seems determined to continue until the last vestige of Western power and influence has been driving from Asia. ![]() May 15, 1964: An on-the-spot military judgment made at the highest level preceded the assignment of 75 bombers to South Vietnam and the assumption must be that this is what the situation requires. Defeat would undermine its positions in Southeast Asia and its prestige everywhere. The United States, which supports the regime in the South, can’t afford to lose. Quoting the Post:Īpril 7, 1961: The United States has a major interest in the defense of Vietnam, not only because of the vast amounts of economic and military aid (which only recently has been turned to the all-important guerrilla warfare training), but also because American prestige is very much involved in the effort to protect the Vietnamese people from Communist absorption.ĭecember 18, 1963: A curious situation prevails in the dirty war and murky politics of Vietnam. The sampling shows how long it took the Post to acknowledge the failures that took the United States into a disastrous war. She examined the war-mongering Post coverage and selected 36 examples of Post stories and editorials. ![]() One had her read through 10 years of Washington Post coverage of the Vietnam war. In the 1970s, I worked with Barbara on several stories. Jamie’s father, Marcus Raskin, ran the Institute for Policy Studies, an often incendiary left-leaning DC think tank, and his mother, Barbara Raskin, was a combative author and journalist. The parents of Congressman Jamie Raskin, leader of the second Democratic attempt to impeach Donald Trump, were longtime hellraisers in the nation’s capital. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |